Awful, Terrible, Terrible Games.

[ApacheMan2K]

It's a sprite-swap of the Speedy Gonzales game.

really? i never imagined any of them as a redone version of one of the Speedy Gonzales games 

[Valkyrie]

Really? Thats weird, I never would have realized a sprite swap on a game like that.

[SBaby]

What I remember...  Worst games:

Revolution X for the SNES.

Heroes of the Lance for the NES (the game that you could beat in 5 minutes, literally.).

Extreme Sports with the Bernstein Bears for the NES (It was basically a collection of minigames where the only differences were what the background looked like.  I'm not even kidding.)

Legend of Zelda:  Wand of Gamelon for the CDI  (One of the legendary Zelda games that had animated cut scenes in it.  I kid you not.  Don't believe me?  Here's some proof.







I know.  Don't get me wrong.  The cut scenes weren't all bad, but the gameplay was terrible...  So horrible that I couldn't even begin to describe it...)

[Threaux]

Revolution X for the SNES.

Explain to me how killing people with CD's while saving Aerosmith isn't a rad concept for a game.


...ok your right, it's pretty bad. 

[Schweinkenstein]

Bebe's Kids for SNES
Fist of the North Star for Gameboy
Sumo Spirits for SNES (the nintendo sumo game was alot better)
but these are all b-rated pieces of crap.

The worst game I've ever played, was one that actually tried to be good. The Adventures of Dr Franken. Try them all out.

[Anonymous]

you want some really bad games?

Try Paperboy on the Atari 2600
and Dangerous Dave for Dos 2.3 on the PC

They are by far the worst games you'll ever have to lay your eyes on

and yea these games were about before a lot of you were even born :]

Neko

[BurkeWorld]

Revenge of Custer 2

Wow.. GG Atari.

Burkey

[ApacheMan2K]

Ghostbusters (NES)
Othello (NES), because the computer player is a cheapskate
Capcom Fighting Evolution (PS2), due to lack of fighter variety and complicated fighting system. well, complicated for me, anyway.

[Schweinkenstein]

paper boy reminded me of those damn Tiger games. Any hand held tiger game is a piece of crap. I wont even call it a video game.

[Valkyrie]

Yeah, those Tiger handhelds were crap. I remember having a couple of them as a kid, and it just wasn't the same as a Nintendo. 16 colors is just 8 times as better as 2

[Marurun]

Capcom Fighting Evolution (PS2), due to lack of fighter variety and complicated fighting system. well, complicated for me, anyway.

The game is complicated, the computer just NEVER makes mistakes. I don't think it's a bad game though.

[SBaby]

Way of the Warrior for the Panasonic 3DO. 

Now, this one wasn't too well known, and would have probably been a really good game, except for two problems.

1:  Terrible graphics for a CD-Rom game.  The characters were basically paper cutouts for reasons unknown.  (They wanted another MK clone.)

2:  The game was impossible to beat.  Now let me give you an example on this, not using me because I am terrible at fighting games.  A buddy of mine had at the time beaten EVERY SINGLE MORTAL KOMBAT GAME THERE WAS!  On every difficulty too!!!  Now, not only didn't this game have a customizable difficulty, but it kicked the crap out of him constantly.  I tell you truly, I have NEVER seen ANYONE win a single round against the computer on this game... 

[Marurun]

Way of the Warrior for the Panasonic 3DO. 

Now, this one wasn't too well known, and would have probably been a really good game, except for two problems.

1:  Terrible graphics for a CD-Rom game.  The characters were basically paper cutouts for reasons unknown.  (They wanted another MK clone.)

2:  The game was impossible to beat.  Now let me give you an example on this, not using me because I am terrible at fighting games.  A buddy of mine had at the time beaten EVERY SINGLE MORTAL KOMBAT GAME THERE WAS!  On every difficulty too!!!  Now, not only didn't this game have a customizable difficulty, but it kicked the crap out of him constantly.  I tell you truly, I have NEVER seen ANYONE win a single round against the computer on this game... 

Was it one of those games where the computer only attacked if you did?

[PsychoRipper]

one of the worst games ive ever played was.....hmmm...everyones talkin about ataris and stuff...i bearly remeber my nes!!i must b young compared to all of u...or something..hmm..the only one i can think of is that truck game mentioned in the begining of this...and NO I DID NOT BUY THAT! if i did...i would of killed myself or something.......

[Schweinkenstein]

Any game for Virtual Boy and Bandhi WonderSwan

[Anonymous]

ET for the gameboy. A completely uncompleteable game

Gremlins and Gremlins 2 for the Apple II and Dragon 32, again not completeable.

But finally one (when it came out in 1981) Ghosts and goblins, Ghouls and ghosts on the Amstrad CPC 464, Spectrum 48K, and Coin op were not completeable. I got to the 453rd level without an boss to fight. I just switched the thing off after 14 hours of play.

Neko

[SCerviche]

sonic 3d blast


god that game sucked.

[Atari]

I got one that tops the list....

ET for the Atari 2600    x.x


And othello isn't too bad Am2k, you did watch me beat the cpu that time     lol

[Marurun]

Any game for Virtual Boy and Bandhi WonderSwan

The Bandai Wonderswan was amazing dude! It had Clock Tower, Final Fantasy 1&2, and Guilty Gear Petite on it! Those are NOT bad games!

[SBaby]

Way of the Warrior for the Panasonic 3DO. 

Now, this one wasn't too well known, and would have probably been a really good game, except for two problems.

1:  Terrible graphics for a CD-Rom game.  The characters were basically paper cutouts for reasons unknown.  (They wanted another MK clone.)

2:  The game was impossible to beat.  Now let me give you an example on this, not using me because I am terrible at fighting games.  A buddy of mine had at the time beaten EVERY SINGLE MORTAL KOMBAT GAME THERE WAS!  On every difficulty too!!!  Now, not only didn't this game have a customizable difficulty, but it kicked the crap out of him constantly.  I tell you truly, I have NEVER seen ANYONE win a single round against the computer on this game... 

Was it one of those games where the computer only attacked if you did?

No, it was one of those games where you could get the computer down halfway before taking a hit, then the computer would suddenly become a gaming prodigy and never make a single mistake.  And since there were no combos in the game, that meant the computer couldn't lose.